Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117407›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Comparative effect of different mindfulness-based intervention types and deliveries on depression in patients with breast cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Deqi Zhang, Wenxin Zhao, Lin Yuan, Qiang Chen, Qiling Xu, Xiaoyu Jiang, Hongyan Bi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deqi ZhangCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0007-0110-3019
Wenxin ZhaoShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Clinical Medical College, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Lin YuanCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Qiang ChenCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0001-2981-9322
Qiling XuCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xiaoyu JiangCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8404-5032
Hongyan BiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China hongyan_bi@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer has become the most common cancer worldwide. Various types of mindfulness-based interventions (e.g., mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction) have been conducted in different delivery methods (including face to face and internet delivered) to help patients with breast cancer mitigate their depression. However, at present, there are no studies that compare the effectiveness of all these types and deliveries of mindfulness-based interventions. Therefore, this protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of various types and deliveries of mindfulness-based interventions in mitigating depression in patients with breast cancer.

methodsThis protocol is according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, The China National Knowledge Infrastructure and OpenGrey, will be comprehensively retrieved for related randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. Two reviewers will independently assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomised Trials 2.0 (RoB 2.0). The network meta-analysis will be performed using the STATA V.16.0, and the assessment of heterogeneity, inconsistency, publication bias, evidence quality, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol does not require approval from an ethics committee as it is based on previous research findings. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024495996.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDepressionMindfulnessSystematic Reviews as TopicFemaleHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicResearch Designbreast tumoursmental healthmeta-analysisquality in health carerehabilitation medicinesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39117407
PMCPMC11404177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.