Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117405›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Development, implementation and usefulness of an intervention to support psychological resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study from a Swedish hospital based on interviews, documents and a survey.

Mariel Taxén, Sara Tolf, Sophia Appelbom, Aleksandra Sjöström-Bujacz, Ninveh Baresso, Karin Herber, Annika Johansson, My Keita, Lotta Ramstedt, Anna Wik Bringby and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mariel TaxénDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara TolfDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophia AppelbomDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aleksandra Sjöström-BujaczDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ninveh BaressoSödertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Karin HerberSödertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Annika JohanssonSödertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
My KeitaSödertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Lotta RamstedtSödertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Anna Wik BringbySödertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Terese StenforsDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pamela MazzocatoDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden pamela.mazzocato@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-6451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA range of interventions to support psychological resilience among healthcare workers were provided in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most research has focused on the content and experience of these interventions, but less is known about their implementation. The aim of this study was to increase understanding of the development, implementation and perceived usefulness of an intervention to support psychological resilience among healthcare workers at a Swedish hospital during the pandemic.

designThis study employs interviews and documents to explore the development and implementation of support activities and a survey to assess the usefulness of the activities (on a scale from 1 to 5). Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the interview data and documents. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the survey data. SETTINGS: A tertiary hospital in the outskirts of Region Stockholm.

participantsEight individual interviews were conducted with actors involved in developing the intervention. 286 healthcare workers answered the survey.

resultsSupport activities were developed and implemented by an internal multidisciplinary group who continuously identified and adapted activities to the needs of staff. The strategy of involving existing resources to jointly develop and continuously adapt staff support activities was beneficial for the implementation and longevity of the intervention. Scheduling difficulties were one of the challenges. The mean ratings of the activities ranged from 2.27 for one-on-one counselling to 3.25 for physical activity. Licensed practical nurses generally valued the activities higher than other professional groups.

conclusionsThe provision of activities to support psychological resilience in a crisis is facilitated by the ability of an organisation to use current resources in the face of a crisis, which is a sign of organisational resilience. Leaders who act quickly and create the conditions to test and learn under uncertainty can contribute to developing effective responses to a crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19Resilience, PsychologicalSARS-CoV-2AdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenchange managementCOVID-19organisational developmentqualitative researchstress, psychological

Identifiers

PMID39117405
PMCPMC11404210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.