ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2025
Autodelineation of Treatment Target Volume for Radiation Therapy Using Large Language Model-Aided Multimodal Learning.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-assisted software development for brachytherapy seed inventory management.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Augmenting patient safety surveillance in radiation oncology with large language model-based root cause analysis: A proof-of-concept study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Clinical Applications of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: A State-of-the-Art Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- A concept of equivalent-volume concordance coefficient for comparing target volumes in radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Intelligent Support for Radiotherapy: A Review of Clinical Applications for Large Language Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Systematic review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Review
- Towards human-centric intelligent treatment planning for radiation therapy.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Sinogram to image: direct reconstruction of photoacoustic tomography image using a hybrid deep learning approach.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Review
- National competition reveals common errors in target delineation among young clinicians in radiation therapy.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- AI-Guided Delineation of Gross Tumor Volume for Body Tumors: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Large language models in oncology: a review.BMJ oncology · 2025Review
- A recent evaluation on the performance of LLMs on radiation oncology physics using questions of randomly shuffled options.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeArtificial intelligence-aided methods have made significant progress in the auto-delineation of normal tissues. However, these approaches struggle with the auto-contouring of radiation therapy target volume. Our goal was to model the delineation of target volume as a clinical decision-making problem, resolved by leveraging large language model-aided multimodal learning approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A vision-language model, termed Medformer, has been developed, employing the hierarchical vision transformer as its backbone and incorporating large language models to extract text-rich features. The contextually embedded linguistic features are seamlessly integrated into visual features for language-aware visual encoding through the visual language attention module. Metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IOU), and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), were used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of our model. The evaluation was conducted on an in-house prostate cancer data set and a public oropharyngeal carcinoma data set, totaling 668 subjects.
resultsOur Medformer achieved a DSC of 0.81 ± 0.10 versus 0.72 ± 0.10, IOU of 0.73 ± 0.12 versus 0.65 ± 0.09, and HD95 of 9.86 ± 9.77 mm versus 19.13 ± 12.96 mm for delineation of gross tumor volume on the prostate cancer dataset. Similarly, on the oropharyngeal carcinoma dataset, it achieved a DSC of 0.77 ± 0.11 versus 0.72 ± 0.09, IOU of 0.70 ± 0.09 versus 0.65 ± 0.07, and HD95 of 7.52 ± 4.8 mm versus 13.63 ± 7.13 mm, representing significant improvements (P < 0.05). For delineating the clinical target volume, Medformer achieved a DSC of 0.91 ± 0.04, IOU of 0.85 ± 0.05, and HD95 of 2.98 ± 1.60 mm, comparable with other state-of-the-art algorithms.
conclusionsAuto-delineation of the treatment target based on multimodal learning outperforms conventional approaches that rely purely on visual features. Our method could be adopted into routine practice to rapidly contour clinical target volume/gross tumor volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.