ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024
A robust paradigm for studying regeneration after traumatic spinal cord injury in zebrafish.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zebrafish as an Integrative Model for Central Nervous System Research: Current Advances and Translational Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundZebrafish are vertebrates with a high potential of regeneration after injury in the central nervous system. Therefore, they have emerged as a useful model system for studying traumatic spinal cord injuries. NEW
methodUsing larval zebrafish, we have developed a robust paradigm to model the effects of anterior spinal cord injury, which correspond to the debilitating injuries of the cervical and thoracic regions in humans. Our new paradigm consists of a more anterior injury location compared to previous studies, a modified behavioral assessment using the visual motor response, and a new data analysis code.
resultsOur approach enables a spinal cord injury closer to the hindbrain with more functional impact compared to previous studies using a more posterior injury location. Results reported in this work reveal recovery over seven days following spinal cord injury. COMPARING WITH EXISTING
methodsThe present work describes a modified paradigm for the in vivo study of spinal cord regeneration after injury using larval zebrafish, including an anterior injury location, a robust behavioral assessment, and a new data analysis software.
conclusionsOur findings lay the foundation for applying this paradigm to study the effects of drugs, nutrition, and other treatments to improve the regeneration process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.