Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39117095›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2024

Stacked regressions and structured variance partitioning for interpretable brain maps.

Ruogu Lin, Thomas Naselaris, Kendrick Kay, Leila Wehbe

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRI.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruogu LinComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.
Thomas NaselarisDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America; Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.
Leila WehbeNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America; Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America. Electronic address: lwehbe@cmu.edu.

Funding

CRCNS: Discovering Computational Principles of Language Processing in the BrainR01DC020088 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PESTILLI, FRANCO, WEHBE, LEILA · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Carnegie Mellon UniversityNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relating brain activity associated with a complex stimulus to different properties of that stimulus is a powerful approach for constructing functional brain maps. However, when stimuli are naturalistic, their properties are often correlated (e.g., visual and semantic features of natural images, or different layers of a convolutional neural network that are used as features of images). Correlated properties can act as confounders for each other and complicate the interpretability of brain maps, and can impact the robustness of statistical estimators. Here, we present an approach for brain mapping based on two proposed methods: stacking different encoding models and structured variance partitioning. Our stacking algorithm combines encoding models that each uses as input a feature space that describes a different stimulus attribute. The algorithm learns to predict the activity of a voxel as a linear combination of the outputs of different encoding models. We show that the resulting combined model can predict held-out brain activity better or at least as well as the individual encoding models. Further, the weights of the linear combination are readily interpretable; they show the importance of each feature space for predicting a voxel. We then build on our stacking models to introduce structured variance partitioning, a new type of variance partitioning that takes into account the known relationships between features. Our approach constrains the size of the hypothesis space and allows us to ask targeted questions about the similarity between feature spaces and brain regions even in the presence of correlations between the feature spaces. We validate our approach in simulation, showcase its brain mapping potential on fMRI data, and release a Python package. Our methods can be useful for researchers interested in aligning brain activity with different layers of a neural network, or with other types of correlated feature spaces.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39117095
PMCPMC12117960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.