Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39116438›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Mapping Knowledge Landscapes and Emerging Trends in AI for Dementia Biomarkers: Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.

Wenhao Qi, Xiaohong Zhu, Danni He, Bin Wang, Shihua Cao, Chaoqun Dong, Yunhua Li, Yanfei Chen, Bingsheng Wang, Yankai Shi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Wenhao QiSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0001-8409-8134
Xiaohong ZhuSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6060-8134
Danni HeSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0748-0655
Bin WangSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0006-3441-9709
Shihua CaoSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9391-2345
Chaoqun DongSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2615-0931
Yunhua LiCollege of Education, Chengdu College of Arts and Sciences, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-1695
Yanfei ChenSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9858-1381
Bingsheng WangSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1143-7959
Yankai ShiSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-4734-2192
Guowei JiangDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology and Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-2164-4653
Fang LiuCollege of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4447-0157
Lizzy M M BootsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology and Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8309-4502
Jiaqi LiSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-5190-1284
Xiajing LouSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-7117
Jiani YaoSchool of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0009-3611-5532
Xiaodong LuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0144-2639
Junling KangDepartment of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2198-1430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of dementia biomarker research, exploring its current developmental trends and research focuses has become increasingly important. This study, using literature data mining, analyzes and assesses the key contributions and development scale of AI in dementia biomarker research.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the current state, hot topics, and future trends of AI in dementia biomarker research globally.

methodsThis study thoroughly analyzed the literature in the application of AI to dementia biomarkers across various dimensions, such as publication volume, authors, institutions, journals, and countries, based on the Web of Science Core Collection. In addition, scales, trends, and potential connections between AI and biomarkers were extracted and deeply analyzed through multiple expert panels.

resultsTo date, the field includes 1070 publications across 362 journals, involving 74 countries and 1793 major research institutions, with a total of 6455 researchers. Notably, 69.41% (994/1432) of the researchers ceased their studies before 2019. The most prevalent algorithms used are support vector machines, random forests, and neural networks. Current research frequently focuses on biomarkers such as imaging biomarkers, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, genetic biomarkers, and blood biomarkers. Recent advances have highlighted significant discoveries in biomarkers related to imaging, genetics, and blood, with growth in studies on digital and ophthalmic biomarkers.

conclusionsThe field is currently in a phase of stable development, receiving widespread attention from numerous countries, institutions, and researchers worldwide. Despite this, stable clusters of collaborative research have yet to be established, and there is a pressing need to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration. Algorithm development has shown prominence, especially the application of support vector machines and neural networks in imaging studies. Looking forward, newly discovered biomarkers are expected to undergo further validation, and new types, such as digital biomarkers, will garner increased research interest and attention.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBibliometricsBiomarkersDementiaHumansBiomarkersAIartificial intelligencebibliometric analysisbiomarkerdementiamachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39116438
PMCPMC11342017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.