Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39116193›Full record

ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024

[Anorectal melanoma: Clinical case].

Marco Alexis De la Mora-Romero, Enrique Salazar-Rios, Emericella Renee Roldán-Medellín, Raquel Galván-Rojas, Cirilo Galindo-García

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco Alexis De la Mora-RomeroInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades "Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda Gutiérrez", Servicio de Cirugía de Colon y Recto. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0001-8453-1041
Enrique Salazar-RiosInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades "Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda Gutiérrez", Servicio de Cirugía de Colon y Recto. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0054-322X
Emericella Renee Roldán-MedellínInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Oncología, Servicio de Patología. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0009-0008-2169-3690
Raquel Galván-RojasInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades "Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda Gutiérrez", Servicio de Cirugía de Colon y Recto. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0238-547X
Cirilo Galindo-GarcíaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades "Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda Gutiérrez", Servicio de Cirugía de Colon y Recto. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0009-0001-0544-8643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive type of tumor, with varied and inconclusive scientific information. Its preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to its rarity and similarity to other anorectal conditions. It represents only 1.3% of melanomas and affects more women than men. Approximately 20-30% of AM cases are amelanotic, complicating endoscopic detection and leading to misdiagnoses. AM is often confused with hemorrhoids, polyps, and rectal cancer in two thirds of patients due to similar symptoms. The causes and risk factors of AM are not well understood, but they are suspected to differ from cutaneous and ocular melanomas. Diagnosis is performed through biopsy and immunohistochemical staining. Colonoscopy helps to characterize the lesions, and histological examination is crucial for definitive diagnosis. Clinical case: 50-year-old woman with rectal bleeding and proctalgia. AM was diagnosed through colonoscopy, and transanal resection with hemorrhoidectomy was performed. Conclusions: Management of AM is complicated by the lack of randomized trials. Resection surgery is the standard treatment, but there is no established protocol. Wide local excision may be an option for limited cases. Further research is needed to improve the management and treatment of AM. Early detection and complete surgical removal are crucial for enhancing survival in these patients.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsMelanomaRectal NeoplasmsColonoscopyFemaleHemorrhoidectomyHumansMiddle AgedAnus NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryHemorrhoidectomyMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID39116193
PMCPMC12105866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.