Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39116039›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024

Evaluation of AlphaFold 3's Protein-Protein Complexes for Predicting Binding Free Energy Changes upon Mutation.

JunJie Wee, Guo-Wei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Testing the reliability of AI-generated protein structures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The transformative power of structural predictions with AI in plant science.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. AlphaFold3: A Transformer in Life Sciences.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

JunJie WeeDepartment of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8444-3252
Guo-Wei WeiDepartment of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5781-2937

Funding

AI-based platform for predicting emerging vaccine-escape variants and designing mutation-proof antibodiesR01AI164266 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Guowei Wei, YONG-HUI ZHENG · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
Discovery-Driven Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence for Biosciences and Drug DiscoveryR35GM148196 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Guowei Wei · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Synthetic glycan conjugates with bacteriophage Qbeta for broad spectrum anti-salmonella vaccinesR01AI146210 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, XUEFEI · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Synergistic integration of topology and machine learning for the predictions of protein-ligand binding affinities and mutation impactsR01GM126189 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WEI, GUOWEI · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146210NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI164266NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126189NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AlphaFold 3 (AF3), the latest version of protein structure prediction software, goes beyond its predecessors by predicting protein-protein complexes. It could revolutionize drug discovery and protein engineering, marking a major step toward comprehensive, automated protein structure prediction. However, independent validation of AF3's predictions is necessary. In this work, we evaluate AF3 complex structures using the SKEMPI 2.0 database which involves 317 protein-protein complexes and 8338 mutations. AF3 complex structures when applied to the most advanced TDL model, MT-TopLap (MultiTask-Topological Laplacian), give rise to a very good Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86 for predicting protein-protein binding free energy changes upon mutation, which is slightly less than the 0.88 achieved earlier with the Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures. Nonetheless, AF3 complex structures led to a 8.6% increase in the prediction RMSE compared to original PDB complex structures. Additionally, some of AF3's complex structures have large errors, which were not captured in its ipTM performance metric. Finally, it is found that AF3's complex structures are not reliable for intrinsically flexible regions or domains.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMutationProtein BindingProteinsSoftwareThermodynamicsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteins

Identifiers

PMID39116039
PMCPMC11351016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.