ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Ten simple rules for recognizing data and software contributions in hiring, promotion, and tenure.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Proofreading of Digitally Reconstructed Neural Morphology Enhances Accuracy, Scalability, and Standardization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ten simple rules for building a collaborative coding culture.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A guide to developing harmonized research workflows in a team science context.Experimental neurology · 2025Review
- Evolving funding strategies for research software: Insights from an international survey of research funders.PloS one · 2025Article
- Challenging the status quo: A guide to open and reproducible neuroimaging for early career researchers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Accelerating the continuous community sharing of digital neuromorphology data.FASEB bioAdvances · 2024Article
- Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey.F1000Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.