ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Effect of Ambient Lighting on Intraocular Pressure Rhythms in Rats.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adrenergic Pathways Mediate Circadian IOP Rhythm in Rats.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Circadian IOP Rhythm in Rats Is Driven by Neural Signals From the Brain.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- The Investigation of Latanoprost's Effects on the Intraocular Pressure of Healthy Male guinea Pigs Under Light and Dark Regimes.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- A system for producing controlled elevation of intraocular pressure in awake Brown Norway rats.Experimental eye research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of ambient lighting on intraocular pressure (IOP) rhythmicity and variability. Methods: IOP was continuously recorded by wireless telemetry from rats under light/dark (LD), dark/light (DL), asymmetric (6L18D and 18D6L), constant dark (DD), and constant light (LL) cycles. In some DD experiments, 1-hour light pulses were presented at varying times. IOP rhythmicity and variability were respectively quantified via cosinor analysis and peak detection algorithms that identified transient and sustained fluctuations. Results: Rat IOP peaked at night and troughed during the day with LD amplitude of 8.7 ± 3.4 mm Hg. Rhythmicity persisted in DD and LL with a free-running period of 24.1 ± 0.3 and 25.2 ± 0.4 hours, respectively. Peak-to-trough amplitude was approximately 60% smaller in LL, often disappeared after 1 to 2 weeks as daytime IOP drifted 2.6 ± 1.5 mm Hg higher, and returned to approximately 60% larger in LD. Rhythmicity was similarly impacted but resynchronized to DL over 4 to 6 days. Rhythmicity was unaltered by short photoperiods (6L18D), but the nocturnal IOP elevation was markedly shortened by long photoperiods (18L6D) and temporarily lowered to daytime levels by light pulses during the subjective night. Transient and sustained event rate, amplitude, interval, and energy content were nearly identical in LD, DD, and LL. Conclusions: Aqueous humor dynamics of rat eyes are intrinsically configured to set IOP at daytime levels. Circadian clock input modulates these dynamics to elevate IOP at night. Light at night blocks this input, sending IOP back to daytime levels. Effects of abnormal lighting on IOP rhythmicity may contribute to pressure-related ocular neuropathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.