Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39115791›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with rehabilitation services utilization in older women with early-stage breast cancer from SEER-Medicare 2009-2018.

Jessica S Gorzelitz, Rachelle Brick, Luqin Deng, Michelle Mollica, Nicole Stout, Stefanie Stoller, Courtney P Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica S GorzelitzDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, 110 IBIF, 115 S. Grand Ave, Iowa City, IA, 52245, USA. Jessica-gorzelitz@uiowa.edu.
Rachelle BrickDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Luqin DengSchool of Medicine, Department of Hematology/Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Michelle MollicaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nicole StoutSchool of Medicine, Department of Hematology/Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Stefanie StollerDepartment of Rehabilitation Services, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.
Courtney P WilliamsDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS L30 CA284498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRehabilitation services are recommended by clinical practice guidelines following breast cancer treatment, yet little is known about how utilization may vary by patient-level characteristics which we aimed to study using SEER-Medicare data.

methodsData from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database was used to identify non-metastatic breast cancer survivors aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed between 2011 and 2016. Rehabilitation services delivered 0-11 months post-diagnosis were identified via outpatient or physician visit claims. Descriptive statistics and associations between patient characteristics and rehabilitation services were calculated using modified Poisson models estimating relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsOf 55,539 breast cancer survivors, 33% (n = 18,244) had received any type of rehabilitative services. Survivors were a mean age of 75 years (SD 6.7), 88% White, 86% urban-dwelling, and 21% Medicare/Medicaid dually enrolled. In adjusted models, patients aged > 75 vs. ≤ 75 were 6% (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96) less likely to have received rehabilitative services. Survivors in an area with greater educational attainment vs. less educational attainment, White vs. non-White, or living in a rural vs. urban area were 26% (1.26, CI 1.22-1.30), 6% (1.06, CI 1.02-1.11), and 6% (1.06, CI 1.02-1.10) more likely to have received rehabilitative services, respectively.

conclusionThe largest differences in rehabilitation utilization were observed for survivors of differing educational and treatment statuses. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research is needed on barriers, access, and delivery of rehabilitation services, specifically for breast cancer survivors who are older-aged, non-White, or Medicare/Medicaid dual eligible.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMedicareNeoplasm StagingSEER ProgramUnited StatesBreast cancerFunctional impairmentHealth services utilizationRehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.