ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Inclusive ABO-Incompatible Listing for Pediatric Heart Transplantation Results in Comparable Post-Transplant Rejection-Free Survival in a Single-Center Series.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ABO-incompatible (ABOi) heart transplantation (HT) has increased organ availability for infants with end-stage heart failure. Despite increasing adoption of ABOi listing for HT, data remain limited regarding pre- and post-HT immunologic profiles to guide listing practices and post-HT follow-up. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate post-HT outcomes at a single center employing inclusive ABOi listing irrespective of pre-HT isohemagglutinin titers. All HT recipients listed at less than 24 months of age at our institution from 2010-2020 were included. Pre- and post-operative variables were compared for ABOi and ABO-compatible (ABOc) recipients. Separate iso-IgG and iso-IgM titers were monitored pre- and post-HT. Primary outcomes were compared between ABOi versus ABOc groups at mid-term follow-up. 51 HTs were performed on 50 patients from 2010-2020 (ABOi, N = 13; ABOc, N = 38). Six ABOi recipients received intra-operative plasma exchange for elevated titers (greater than 1:8 for IgG or IgM or reverse type greater than 2 +). Treated rejection, DSA, CAV, primary graft failure, need for re-HT, and survival were comparable between ABOi and ABOc groups at mid-term follow-up. An inclusive approach to ABOi HT listing for infants less than 24 months of age results in comparable post-transplant rejection-free survival, CAV, and prevalence of DSA at mid-term follow-up. These data define a potential role for specific IgM and IgG testing to promote understanding of risk stratification in pediatric ABOi listing, and support an inclusive strategy irrespective of high pre-HT titers to expand the number of available donor hearts for infants and older children awaiting HT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39115706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.