ArticleArchives of toxicology2024
Interpreting mono- and poly-SCRA intoxications from an activity-based point of view: JWH-018 equivalents in serum as a comparative measure.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Side-Chain Homologs of ΔMolecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Development of a novel risk score reflecting the relative harm potential of synthetic cannabinoids based on prevalence estimates, well-documented intoxication cases and basic pharmacological data.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Outsmarting generic legislation: 4 years into the cat-and-mouse game of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist market since the Chinese ban in 2021.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are a class of synthetic drugs that mimic and greatly surpass the effect of recreational cannabis. Acute SCRA intoxications are in general difficult to assess due to the large number of compounds involved, differing widely in both chemical structure and pharmacological properties. The rapid pace of emergence of unknown SCRAs hampers on one hand the timely availability of methods for identification and quantification to confirm and estimate the extent of the SCRA intoxication. On the other hand, lack of knowledge about the harm potential of emerging SCRAs hampers adequate interpretation of serum concentrations in intoxication cases. In the present study, a novel comparative measure for SCRA intoxications was evaluated, focusing on the cannabinoid activity (versus serum concentrations), which can be measured in serum extracts with an untargeted bioassay assessing ex vivo CB
Indexed as
Identifiers
39115690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.