ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2024
Prolonged retention of luliconazole nanofibers for topical mycotic condition: development, in vitro characterization and antifungal activity against Candida albicans.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Poloxamer 188 stabilized poly (ε-caprolactone) microspheres of voriconazole for targeting pulmonary aspergillosis.Therapeutic delivery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An antifungal agent, luliconazole, is commercially available in cream or gel form. The major limitation of these conventional formulations is less residence time at the infection site. The primary objective of this work was to develop luliconazole-loaded polyvinyl alcohol (Luz-PVA) nanofibers for mycotic skin conditions with a longer retention. Luz-PVA nanofibers were prepared by plate electrospinning and optimized for polymer concentration and process parameters. The optimized batch (Trial 5) was prepared by 10% PVA, processed at 22.4 kV applied voltage, and 14 cm plate and spinneret distance to yield thick, uniform, and peelable nanofibers film. There was no interaction observed between Luz and PVA in the FTIR study. DSC and XRD analysis showed that luliconazole was loaded into fabricated nanofibers with a reduced crystallinity. FESEM studies confirmed the smooth, defect-free mats of nanofibers. Luz-PVA nanofibers possessed a tensile strength of 21.8 N and a maximum elongation of 10.8%, representing the excellent elasticity of the scaffolds. For Luz-PVA nanofibers, the sustained and complete drug release was observed in 48 h. In antifungal activity using Candida albicans, the Luz-PVA nanofibers showed a greater zone of inhibition (30.55 ± 0.38 mm and 29.27 ± 0.31 mm) than marketed cream (28.06 ± 0.18 mm and 28.47 ± 0.24 mm) and pure drug (27.57 ± 0.17 mm and 27.50 ± 0.47 mm) at 1% concentration in Sabouraud dextrose agar and yeast malt agar, respectively. Therefore, Luz-PVA nanofibers exhibited good mechanical properties, longer retention time, and better antifungal activity than marketed products and, therefore, can be further examined preclinically as a potential treatment option for topical mycotic infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.