Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39115454›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2024

Correction of Trauma-induced Coagulopathy by Goal-directed Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the ITACTIC Trial.

Charlotte Lindsay, Ross Davenport, Kjersti Baksaas-Aasen, Knut Magne Kolstadbråten, Pål Aksel Naess, Nicola Curry, Marc Maegele, Nicole Juffermans, Simon Stanworth, Jakob Stensballe and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Multicenter survey on viscoelastic assays access and use in trauma in Swiss emergency departments.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Charlotte LindsayCentre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7283-857X
Ross DavenportCentre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Blizard Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Kjersti Baksaas-AasenOslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Knut Magne KolstadbråtenOslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Aksel NaessOslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Nicola CurryOxford University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marc MaegeleCologne-Merheim Medical Centre, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Nicole JuffermansErasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Simon StanworthOxford University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jakob StensballeCopenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per Ingemar JohanssonCopenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christine GaarderOslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Karim BrohiOslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0643-8866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrauma hemorrhage induces a coagulopathy with a high associated mortality rate. The Implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma Induced Coagulopathy (ITACTIC) randomized trial tested two goal-directed treatment algorithms for coagulation management: one guided by conventional coagulation tests and one by viscoelastic hemostatic assays (viscoelastic). The lack of a difference in 28-day mortality led the authors to hypothesize that coagulopathic patients received insufficient treatment to correct coagulopathy.

methodsDuring ITACTIC, two sites were coenrolling patients into an ongoing prospective observational study, which included serial blood sampling at the same intervals as in ITACTIC. The subgroup in both studies had conventional and viscoelastic test results for each patient available for analysis. A goal-directed treatment was defined as one triggered by an ITACTIC algorithm. Coagulopathy was defined as rotational thromboelastometry EXTEM A5 less than 40 mm. The primary outcome was correction of coagulopathy by the 12th unit of erythrocyte transfusion during resuscitation.

resultsFull viscoelastic and conventional coagulation test results were available for 133 patients. Of these patients, 71% were coagulopathic on admission, and 16% developed a coagulopathy during resuscitation. ITACTIC viscoelastic hemostatic assay group patients were more likely to receive goal-directed treatment than the standard group (76% vs. 47%; odds ratio, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.64 to 8.49; P = 0.002). However, only 54% of patients received goal-directed treatment, and only 20% corrected their coagulopathy (vs. 0% with empiric treatment alone; not significant). Median time to first goal-directed treatment was 68 (53 to 88) min for viscoelastic and 110 (77 to 123) min for standard (P = 0.005).

conclusionsIn ITACTIC, many bleeding trauma patients did not receive an indicated goal-directed treatment. Interventions arrived late during resuscitation and were only partially effective at correcting coagulopathy. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersEarly Goal-Directed TherapyWounds and InjuriesAdultAlgorithmsBlood Coagulation TestsFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesResuscitationThrombelastographyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39115454
PMCPMC11462890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.