Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39115410›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Niche separation in bacterial communities and activities in porewater, loosely attached, and firmly attached fractions in permeable surface sediments.

Chyrene Moncada, Carol Arnosti, Jan D Brüwer, Dirk de Beer, Rudolf Amann, Katrin Knittel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chyrene MoncadaDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Carol ArnostiDepartment of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Jan D BrüwerDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Dirk de BeerDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Rudolf AmannDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Katrin KnittelDepartment of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

Funding

Max Planck SocietyNational Science Foundation OCE-2022952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterotrophic microbes are central to organic matter degradation and transformation in marine sediments. Currently, most investigations of benthic microbiomes do not differentiate between processes in the porewater and on the grains and, hence, only show a generalized picture of the community. This limits our understanding of the structure and functions of sediment microbiomes. To address this problem, we fractionated sandy surface sediment microbial communities from a coastal site in Isfjorden, Svalbard, into cells associated with the porewater, loosely attached to grains, and firmly attached to grains; we found dissimilar bacterial communities and metabolic activities in these fractions. Most (84%-89%) of the cells were firmly attached, and this fraction comprised more anaerobes, such as sulfate reducers, than the other fractions. The porewater and loosely attached fractions (3% and 8%-13% of cells, respectively) had more aerobic heterotrophs. These two fractions generally showed a higher frequency of dividing cells, polysaccharide (laminarin) hydrolysis rates, and per-cell O2 consumption than the firmly attached cells. Thus, the different fractions occupy distinct niches within surface sediments: the firmly attached fraction is potentially made of cells colonizing areas on the grain that are protected from abrasion, but might be more diffusion-limited for organic matter and electron acceptors. In contrast, the porewater and loosely attached fractions are less resource-limited and have faster growth. Their cell numbers are kept low possibly through abrasion and exposure to grazers. Differences in community composition and activity of these cell fractions point to their distinct roles and contributions to carbon cycling within surface sediments.

Indexed as

BacteriaGeologic SedimentsMicrobiotaHeterotrophic ProcessesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSvalbardRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingArcticCARD-FISHfrequency of dividing cellshydrolysis ratesmetagenomesnichesoxygen consumptionsurface sediments

Identifiers

PMID39115410
PMCPMC11368169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.