ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
GENEVIC: GENetic data Exploration and Visualization via Intelligent interactive Console.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review on the generative AI applications in human medical genetics.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Alzheimer's disease: genetic background in the era of next-generation sequencing technologies.Brain communications · 2026Review
- BrainGeneBot: a framework for variant prioritization and generative pretrained transformer-informed interpretation across polygenic risk score studies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Bridging artificial intelligence and biological sciences: a comprehensive review of large language models in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Enhancing the utility of polygenic scores in Alzheimer's disease through systematic curation and annotation.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Rank Aggregation Methods and Tools in Genomic Data Analysis.Current genomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryThe vast generation of genetic data poses a significant challenge in efficiently uncovering valuable knowledge. Introducing GENEVIC, an AI-driven chat framework that tackles this challenge by bridging the gap between genetic data generation and biomedical knowledge discovery. Leveraging generative AI, notably ChatGPT, it serves as a biologist's "copilot." It automates the analysis, retrieval, and visualization of customized domain-specific genetic information, and integrates functionalities to generate protein interaction networks, enrich gene sets, and search scientific literature from PubMed, Google Scholar, and arXiv, making it a comprehensive tool for biomedical research. In its pilot phase, GENEVIC is assessed using a curated database that ranks genetic variants associated with Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and cognition, based on their effect weights from the Polygenic Score (PGS) Catalog, thus enabling researchers to prioritize genetic variants in complex diseases. GENEVIC's operation is user-friendly, accessible without any specialized training, secured by Azure OpenAI's HIPAA-compliant infrastructure, and evaluated for its efficacy through real-time query testing. As a prototype, GENEVIC is set to advance genetic research, enabling informed biomedical decisions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GENEVIC is publicly accessible at https://genevicanath2024.streamlit.app. The underlying code is open-source and available via GitHub at https://github.com/bsml320/GENEVIC.git (also at https://github.com/anath2110/GENEVIC.git).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.