ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025
Long-Term Outcomes of a Cultured Autologous Dermo-Epidermal Skin Substitute in Children: 5-Year Results of a Phase I Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02145130 (A Phase I, Two Armed, Open, Prospective and Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety of Autologous Tissue-engineered Dermal Substitutes and Dermo-epidermal Skin Substitutes for the Treatment of Large Deep Partial and Full Thickness Skin Defects in Children and Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I, Two Armed, Open, Prospective and Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety of Autologous Tissue-engineered Dermal Substitutes and Dermo-epidermal Skin Substitutes for the Treatment of Large Deep Partial and Full Thickness Skin Defects in Children and Adults
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Cellularized Skin Substitute Bioengineering for Regenerative Medicine: Cell Sources, Culture Strategies, and Transition Toward Defined, Xeno-Free Culture Systems.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of bio-engineered, autologous dermo-epidermal skin grafts in adolescent and adult burn patients: 1-year results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter phase IIB clinical trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Laboratory-Generated Autologous Skin Substitutes for Burn Treatment in Europe: Narrative Review, Experts' Opinion, and Legal Considerations.European burn journal · 2025Review
- Strategies for Optimizing Acute Burn Wound Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Long-Term Histological Evaluation of a Novel Dermal Template in the Treatment of Pediatric Burns.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of bio-engineered, autologous dermo-epidermal skin grafts in reconstructive surgery: 1-year results of a prospective, randomized, intra-patient controlled, multicenter phase II clinical trial.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limited donor sites and poor long-term outcomes with standard treatment for large skin defects remain a huge problem. An autologous, bilayered, laboratory-grown skin substitute (denovoSkin) was developed to overcome this problem and has shown to be safe in 10 pediatric patients in a Phase I clinical trial after transplantation. The goal of this article was to report on 48-month long-term results. The pediatric participants of the phase I clinical trial were followed up at yearly visits up to 5 years after transplantation. Safety parameters, including the occurrence of adverse events, possible deviations of vital signs, and changes in concomitant therapy as well as additional parameters regarding skin stability, scar quality, and tumor formation, were assessed. Furthermore, scar maturation was photographically documented. Of the 10 patients treated with denovoSkin in this phase I clinical trial, 7 completed the 5-year follow-up period. Skin substitutes continued to be deemed safe, remained stable, and practically unchanged, with no sign of fragility and no tumor formation at clinical examination. Scar quality, captured using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, was evaluated as close to normal skin. Transplantation of this laboratory-grown skin substitute in children is to date considered safe and shows encouraging functional and aesthetical long-term results close to normal skin. These results are promising and highlight the potential of a life-saving therapy for large skin defects. A multicentre, prospective, randomized, phase II clinical trial is currently ongoing to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this novel skin substitute. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02145130.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.