Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39115030›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2025

Cost-effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation for acquired brain injuries: Update of Stolwyk et al.'s (2019) review.

Mauro Mancuso, Ilaria Valentini, Michele Basile, Audrey Bowen, Helena Fordell, Roberta Laurita, Marika C Möller, Lindy J Williams, Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mauro MancusoPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine Unit, NHS-USL South-East Tuscany, Grosseto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-9277
Ilaria ValentiniAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS) - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5940-7495
Michele BasileAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS) - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1098-2648
Audrey BowenManchester Centre for Health Psychology and Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-1215
Helena FordellDepartment of Clinical Science, Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1650-8856
Roberta LauritaAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS) - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5716-6624
Marika C MöllerDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-5186
Lindy J WilliamsFaculty of Health, School of Health Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7203-1007
Pierluigi ZoccolottiTuscany Rehabilitation Clinic, Montevarchi (AR), Montevarchi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6351-2455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquired brain injuries (ABI), resulting from stroke or traumatic brain injury, cause a range of neuropsychological impairments and many patients continue to experience neuropsychological deficits years after onset. The increasing average age of the population highlights the importance of effective management strategies for the consequences of ABI. Despite the well-documented impact of rehabilitation interventions, the cost-effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation remains largely unknown. This study conducted a scoping review to update the findings of Stolwyk et al. (Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2021, 31, 316), focusing on the economic evaluations of neuropsychological rehabilitation for individuals with ABI. Following the PIO framework, PRISMA ScR guidelines, and systematic review reporting checklist, the review screened 1027 articles and included eight studies published between 2019 and 2024. The studies encompassed either language rehabilitation or general neuropsychological programs, including neuropsychological interventions. The economic analyses, including two cost-effectiveness, five cost-utility, and one cost-benefit study, mostly adhered to CHEERS guidelines, enhancing the transparency and methodological rigour of their reporting. These studies demonstrated varying degrees of cost-effectiveness for interventions targeting post-stroke language disorders and neuropsychological rehabilitation for ABI, with significant cost savings and health benefits observed, particularly for home-based rehabilitation interventions. The included studies suffered from a short time horizon, limiting the ability to capture the long-term economic impacts and effectiveness of the interventions. Future research should focus on longer-term follow-up data and include broader search strategies to enhance understanding and optimise health care interventions. A comprehensive implementation of these economic analyses is crucial for informing policymakers, enabling them to introduce rehabilitative interventions based on solid evidence.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesCost-Benefit AnalysisNeurological RehabilitationStroke RehabilitationHumansacquired brain injurycost‐effectivenessneuropsychologyrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39115030
PMCPMC11891378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.