Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114986›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Reclaiming behaviour settings: reviewing empirical applications of Barker's behaviour settings theory.

Christa M Avram, Anne E Jones, Miranda L Lucas, Louise Barrett

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. People, places, things and communities: expanding behaviour settings theory in the twenty-first century.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Reclaiming behaviour settings: reviewing empirical applications of Barker's behaviour settings theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Navigating the normativity of behaviour settings: an observational case study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Observational
  5. A practitioner's field guide to the behaviour settings method.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christa M AvramDepartment of Psychology, University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge T1K 3M4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1324-9254
Anne E JonesDepartment of Psychology, University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge T1K 3M4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-0439
Miranda L LucasDepartment of Psychology, University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge T1K 3M4, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-2646-7316
Louise BarrettDepartment of Psychology, University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge T1K 3M4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1841-2997

Funding

Canada Research ChairsInternational Society for Human EthologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behaviour settings theory is the product of Roger Barker and Herbert F. Wright's decades-long Midwest Field Station research programme. The theory followed from the demonstration that the best predictor of a person's behaviour was the setting (i.e. location, timing and activity) in which their behaviour took place, rather than any individual trait (e.g. personality). Now little known in psychology, behaviour settings theory is often further obscured by being presented as a theory only, neglecting the clear methodology Barker provided for investigating the question: 'What do people do in everyday life?' This literature review takes a comprehensive look at Barker's contributions both within and outside of psychology. The corpus comprises both theoretical and empirical articles; however, our primary interest is in the empirical articles. We describe the who, when and where of behaviour settings research over the past half-century, and we identify branches and neighbours of behaviour settings research (e.g. manning theory, behaviour mapping and activity settings theory). Primarily, however, we attempt to answer the following questions: (i) Are any of Barker's tools for studying people in everyday settings being used currently? (ii) How accurately has Barker's theory been explained, or his methods applied? (iii) Does such work contribute to behaviour settings theory in a meaningful way? This article is part of the theme issue 'People, places, things and communities: expanding behaviour settings theory in the twenty-first century'.

Indexed as

Psychological TheoryHistory, 20th CenturyHumansbehaviour settingsbehaviour settings theoryecological psychologyK-21Roger Barker

Identifiers

PMID39114986
PMCPMC11338576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.