ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024
Electron beam radiotherapy for the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal margin.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE AND
objectiveSquamous cell carcinoma of the anal margin (SCCAM) is an uncommon lesion that comprises one-third to a quarter of all anal squamous cell carcinoma. Treatment involves surgery or exclusive radiotherapy for small tumours, whereas the preferred treatment for larger tumours is chemoradiotherapy. In our department, selected patients with SCCAM are treated with electron beam radiotherapy using one perineal field. The present study evaluates this strategy. MATERIAL AND
methodsAll consecutive patients with SCCAM and treated with electron beam radiotherapy from 2012 to 2022 were included. Data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records and analysed descriptively. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier statistics.
resultsForty patients were evaluated. Primary radiotherapy was delivered in 35 (87.5%) patients. Five (12.5%) patients had postoperative radiotherapy. Median prescription dose was 60.0 (range 45.0-60.2) Gy in 28 (range 10-30) fractions delivered with 8 (range 4-18) MeV using a standard circular aperture and bolus. At a median follow-up of 73 (range 9-135) months, 7 (17.5%) patients were diagnosed with local recurrences. The 5-year LC rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 71.4%-97.2%). Analysis of LC according to T-stage revealed a 5-year LC of 100% (95% CI: 100%-100%) in T1 tumours compared to 57.0% (95% CI: 27.4%-86.6%) in T2 tumours (p < 0.001). 5-year OS was 91.6% (95% CI: 83.0%-100%). Late grade 3 toxicity included ulceration in the skin and subcutis in 2 (5.0%) patients. INTEPRETATION: Electron beam radiotherapy enables the delivery of 'eye-guided' radiotherapy directly to the tumour. LC is good in patients with T1 tumours. Patients with T2 tumours have less satisfactory LC and should be treated with chemoradiotherapy. Electron beam radiotherapy enables the delivery of "eye-guided" RT directly to the tumour. LC is excellent in patients with T1 tumours. Patients with T2 tumours have less satisfactory LC and should be treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.