Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114945›Full record

ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2024

Full optimization of dynamic nuclear polarization on a 1 tesla benchtop polarizer with hyperpolarizing solids.

Ewoud Vaneeckhaute, Charlotte Bocquelet, Léa Bellier, Huu-Nghia Le, Nathan Rougier, Shebha Anandhi Jegadeesan, Sanjay Vinod-Kumar, Guinevere Mathies, Laurent Veyre, Chloe Thieuleux and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. BoostingScience advances · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ewoud VaneeckhauteUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS Lyon, UCBL, CRMN UMR 5082, 69100 Villeurbanne, France. ewoud.vaneeckhaute@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-6246
Charlotte BocqueletUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS Lyon, UCBL, CRMN UMR 5082, 69100 Villeurbanne, France. ewoud.vaneeckhaute@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3833-5031
Léa BellierUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS Lyon, UCBL, CRMN UMR 5082, 69100 Villeurbanne, France. ewoud.vaneeckhaute@univ-lyon1.fr.
Huu-Nghia LeUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Institut de Chimie de Lyon, CP2M UMR 5128 CNRS-UCBL-CPE Lyon, 69616 Villeurbanne, France.
Nathan RougierUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS Lyon, UCBL, CRMN UMR 5082, 69100 Villeurbanne, France. ewoud.vaneeckhaute@univ-lyon1.fr.
Shebha Anandhi JegadeesanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstr. 10, 78464, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-1939
Sanjay Vinod-KumarDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstr. 10, 78464, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4805-8418
Guinevere MathiesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstr. 10, 78464, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2719-0743
Laurent VeyreUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Institut de Chimie de Lyon, CP2M UMR 5128 CNRS-UCBL-CPE Lyon, 69616 Villeurbanne, France.
Chloe ThieuleuxUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Institut de Chimie de Lyon, CP2M UMR 5128 CNRS-UCBL-CPE Lyon, 69616 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5436-2467
Roberto MelziBruker Italia S.r.l., Viale V. Lancetti 43, 20158 Milano, Italy.
Daniel BanksBruker Biospin, Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2352-7457
James KempfBruker Biospin, Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, USA.
Quentin SternUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS Lyon, UCBL, CRMN UMR 5082, 69100 Villeurbanne, France. ewoud.vaneeckhaute@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-030X
Sami JanninUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENS Lyon, UCBL, CRMN UMR 5082, 69100 Villeurbanne, France. ewoud.vaneeckhaute@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-4929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperpolarization by dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (dDNP) provides the opportunity to dramatically increase the weak nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signal of liquid molecular targets using the high polarization of electron radicals. Unfortunately, the solution-state hyperpolarization can only be accessed once since freezing and melting of the hyperpolarized sample happen in an irreversible fashion. A way to expand the application horizon of dDNP can therefore be to find a recyclable DNP alternative. To pursue this ambitious goal, we recently introduced the concept of recyclable hyperpolarized flow (HypFlow) DNP where hyperpolarization happens in porous hyperpolarizing solids placed in a compact benchtop DNP polarizer at a magnetic field of 1 T and a temperature of 77 K. Here we aim to optimize the radical concentrations immobilized in hyperpolarizing solids with the objective of generating as much polarization as possible in a timeframe (<1 s) compatible with future recyclable DNP applications. To do so, the solid-state DNP enhancement factors, build-up rates and DNP spectra of different hyperpolarizing solids containing various nitroxide radical loadings (20-74 μmol cm

Identifiers

PMID39114945
PMCPMC11307143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.