ArticleAnnals of surgery2026
Prospective Validation of the Pancreatic Fistula Risk Classification by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (PARIS Trial).
Article in Annals of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avoiding the knot: the no-knots pancreatojejunostomy for redistribution of traction forces on the pancreatic parenchyma.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes After Multiorgan Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Article
- Pancreatic anastomotic technique during pancreaticoduodenectomy: does it boil down to surgeon preference?Gland surgery · 2026Article
- What did the prospective validation of the Pancreatic Fistula Risk Classification by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (PARIS) trial tell us?Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Estimation of pancreatic histology and likelihood of postoperative pancreatic fistula using extracellular volume fraction from contrast-enhanced computed tomography.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo prospectively validate the recently established International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) pancreas classification as a parenchymal risk classification system for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
backgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the major driver for complications after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Recently, the ISGPS published a pancreas classification containing the parameters of main pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic texture to help assess the risk of POPF development after PD.
methodsFrom January 2020 to July 2021, 271 patients receiving elective PD were included after informed consent. The postoperative course was documented prospectively up to postoperative day 30. Among the pancreas characteristics, the main pancreatic duct and pancreatic texture were assessed intraoperatively at the pancreatic resection margin, and the pancreatic glands were assigned to one of the 4 pancreas classes according to the ISGPS (A-D). The primary endpoint was POPF according to the updated ISGPS definition. Secondary endpoints comprised other post-PD morbidity and mortality.
resultsOf 271 patients, 264 had available data according to the ISGPS pancreas classification. Of those, 78 were assigned to class A (30%), 53 to class B (20%), 50 to class C (19%) and 83 to class D (31%). POPF occurred in 54 of 271 patients (19.9%). The 30-day mortality was 7/271 (2.6%), with 6/7 having developed POPF (86%). POPF rates within the classes A, B, C, and D were 9.0%, 11.3%, 20.0%, and 37.4%, respectively ( P < 0.001). In the univariable regression analysis, only patients in pancreas class D demonstrated a significantly higher risk for POPF when compared with class A (odds ratio: 6.05; 95% CI: 2.6-15.9; P < 0.001). In the multivariable regression model, patients in class D had a significantly higher risk for POPF compared with class A (odds ratio: 3.45; 95% CI: 1.15-11.3; P = 0.032). The model comprised body mass index, surgery duration, microscopic fibrosis, and the ISGPS pancreas classification, demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) value of ∼0.82 when tested on the PARIS data set.
conclusionsThis prospective trial shows that the ISGPS pancreas classification is valid. Patients in risk class D are prone to POPF independently of other factors. Therefore, all future publications on pancreatic surgery should report the risk class according to the ISGPS pancreas classification to allow for a better comparison of reported cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39114920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.