Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114896›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2025

20-Year trends in the social participation of the oldest old.

Erika Augustsson, Stefan Fors, Johan Rehnberg, Carin Lennartsson, Neda Agahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erika AugustssonAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9958-4090
Stefan ForsAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan RehnbergAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0582-5058
Carin LennartssonAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neda AgahiAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate 20-year trends in social participation among the oldest old (77+ years) in Sweden and assess the extent to which changes in educational attainment and functional abilities explain these trends.

methodsSeven waves of the Swedish Panel Study of Living Conditions of the Oldest Old (SWEOLD) spanning 2002-2021 were used with a repeated cross-sectional design. To analyse the association between time and social participation we employed the Karlson-Holm-Breen method of decomposition. The study focused on informal social participation (contact with friends and family), leisure participation (public or semi-public gatherings), and formal participation (organisational engagement and study circle attendance).

resultsBoth leisure and informal participation peaked in 2014 and declined in 2021, influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas formal participation showed a slight increase in 2021. Total participation increased at least until 2011. Overall, older adults have increased their levels of social participation in recent decades, disregarding the influence of the pandemic. Decomposition analysis revealed that population-level changes in educational attainment and functional abilities explained a substantial portion of the observed trends.

conclusions

Indexed as

Social ParticipationAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansLeisure ActivitiesMaleSwedenoldest oldsocial participationTrends

Identifiers

PMID39114896
PMCPMC12598059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.