ReviewExpert review of hematology2024
Applications of artificial intelligence to myeloproliferative neoplasms: a narrative review.
Review in Expert review of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Scores and Risk Stratification of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: 2026 Updates.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- A Dual-Feature Framework for Enhanced Diagnosis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Subtypes Using Artificial Intelligence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly growing field of computational research with the potential to extract nuanced biomarkers for the prediction of outcomes of interest. AI implementations for the prediction for clinical outcomes for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are currently under investigation. AREAS COVERED: In this narrative review, we discuss AI investigations for the improvement of MPN clinical care utilizing either clinically available data or experimental laboratory findings. Abstracts and manuscripts were identified upon querying PubMed and the American Society of Hematology conference between 2000 and 2023. Overall, multidisciplinary researchers have developed AI methods in MPNs attempting to improve diagnostic accuracy, risk prediction, therapy selection, or pre-clinical investigations to identify candidate molecules as novel therapeutic agents. EXPERT OPINION: It is our expert opinion that AI methods in MPN care and hematology will continue to grow with increasing clinical utility. We believe that AI models will assist healthcare workers as clinical decision support tools if appropriately developed with AI-specific regulatory guidelines. Though the reported findings in this review are early investigations for AI in MPNs, the collective work developed by the research community provides a promising framework for improving decision-making in the future of MPN clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.