Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114857›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2024

Mirror-assisted light-sheet microscopy: a simple upgrade to enable bi-directional sample excitation.

Asaph Zylbertal, Isaac H Bianco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asaph ZylbertalUniversity College London, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-2468
Isaac H BiancoUniversity College London, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3149-4862

Funding

Wellcome Trust 220273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Light-sheet microscopy is a powerful imaging technique that achieves optical sectioning via selective illumination of individual sample planes. However, when the sample contains opaque or scattering tissues, the incident light sheet may not be able to uniformly excite the entire sample. For example, in the context of larval zebrafish whole-brain imaging, occlusion by the eyes prevents access to a significant portion of the brain during common implementations using unidirectional illumination. Aim: We introduce mirror-assisted light-sheet microscopy (mLSM), a simple inexpensive method that can be implemented on existing digitally scanned light-sheet setups by adding a single optical element-a mirrored micro-prism. The prism is placed near the sample to generate a second excitation path for accessing previously obstructed regions. Approach: Scanning the laser beam onto the mirror generates a second, reflected illumination path that circumvents the occlusion. Online tuning of the scanning and laser power waveforms enables near uniform sample excitation with dual illumination. Results: mLSM produces cellular-resolution images of zebrafish brain regions inaccessible to unidirectional illumination. The imaging quality in regions illuminated by the direct or reflected sheet is adjustable by translating the excitation objective. The prism does not interfere with visually guided behavior. Conclusions: mLSM presents an easy-to-implement, cost-effective way to upgrade an existing light-sheet system to obtain more imaging data from a biological sample.

Indexed as

calcium imaginglight-sheet microscopyselective plane illumination microscopyvolumetric imagingzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID39114857
PMCPMC11304984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.