Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114847›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2024

Successful management of a delayed presented button battery ingestion in a toddler: A case report and literature review.

Pouya Ebrahimi, Roozbeh Nazari, Seyedeh Maryam Mousavinezhad, Nahid Senobari, Delaram J Ghadimi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pouya EbrahimiTehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Disease Research Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3694-6863
Roozbeh NazariDepartment of Cardiology Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1588-2812
Seyedeh Maryam MousavinezhadDepartment of Cardiology School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9636-652X
Nahid SenobariDepartment of Cardiology Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7142-8230
Delaram J GhadimiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8326-7098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key Clinical Message: It is important to note that prevention of button battery ingestion is the most effective way to reduce its incidence and complications. This is unachievable without providing educational plans for parents. Moreover, triage nurses and first-line staff who take the history of patients and physicians should take the history to evaluate the risk of battery ingestion. Plain radiographs can be helpful in this matter, as the presence of "Hallow" and "Steep" signs in the anteroposterior and lateral views, respectively, can help. Abstract: Foreign body ingestion is a relatively common occurrence in pediatrics, especially among children 1-3 years of age. Although most cases are benign and managed conservatively, those with high-risk subjects such as button batterie can bring about fatal conditions in the minority of cases. In the present study, the history, diagnostic, and therapeutic procedures of a 13-month-old baby with the final diagnosis of button battery ingestion are presented. The parents ignored the symptoms, suspecting that it was a viral infection. The evaluations showed that a battery was lodged in the middle part of the thoracic esophagus, which was removed by an urgent endoscopic procedure. The patient was under observation and on a nothing-by-mouth diet for a week, receiving nutritional fluid with a nasogastric tube. The necrosis, which was obvious after the removal of the battery, was healing in the second control esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed 1 week after the procedure. The stricture was minimal, and no need for dilation was diagnosed. This case report underscores the importance of a timely diagnosis and removal of these cases. This case underscores the importance of the timely presentation of these cases to health care and the risk of delayed removal, such as necrosis, forming fistula, and perforation of the esophagus. The delay can cause necrosis, fistula, and perforation and might lead to irreversible severe complications and even death.

Indexed as

button batteryforeign body ingestiongastroenterologynecrosispediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39114847
PMCPMC11303662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.