Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114804›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Influenced: Exploring the Effect of Social Media on Medical Students' Perceptions of Plastic Surgery.

Aubree Ford, Courtney Doherty, James D Vargo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aubree FordFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb.
Courtney DohertyFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb.
James D VargoFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Neb.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical students rarely receive dedicated education in plastic surgery, exposing them to influence from the internet or television programming that is frequently skewed toward cosmetic procedures. Additionally, social media posts from board-certified plastic surgeons make up a small portion of available content. These biased representations may impact students' perceptions, narrowing the scope of referrals and limiting career exploration. Methods: Medical students at two academic medical centers were surveyed. Blinded data were collected on exposure to plastic surgery, social media usage, observed content, and perceptions of the specialty. Students' understanding of plastic surgery was evaluated using clinical scenarios. Results: The response rate was 24.3%. Social media and television were the primary contributors to understanding of plastic surgery in 51.6% of students, especially for those who had not completed a surgical clerkship ( Conclusions: Social media and television play a significant role in medical students' perceptions of plastic surgery. Students are also more likely to see posts from influencers than board-certified plastic surgeons, furthering potential bias. Quality content from board-certified surgeons and professional societies may improve scope of practice creep and student interest.

Identifiers

PMID39114804
PMCPMC11305763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.