Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114802›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

An Update on the Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2019-2022): Trends, Predictors, and Program Leaders' Perspectives.

Chris Amro, Isabel A Ryan, J Reed McGraw, Robyn B Broach, Stephen J Kovach, Joseph M Serletti, Paris D Butler, Jeffrey E Janis, Saïd C Azoury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Osteopathic Graduates in Plastic Surgery: How Can We Improve the Pipeline?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chris AmroFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Isabel A RyanFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
J Reed McGrawFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Robyn B BroachFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Stephen J KovachFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Joseph M SerlettiFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Paris D ButlerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Jeffrey E JanisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Saïd C AzouryFrom Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A previous study by the authors noted a decline in independent plastic surgery residency programs and rising applicant participation. This study provides updates on match trends and influential predictors, and gathers program leaders' views on the future of the independent track. Methods: Match data (2019-2022) were obtained from the San Francisco match after American Council of Educators in Plastic Surgery approval. Variables influencing match success were analyzed, and program leaders were surveyed about desirable applicant traits and program trajectories. Results: From 2019 to 2022, 243 of 428 applicants matched. Programs and positions declined by 10% and 9.5%, respectively. Applicants rose to 42.3%, but match rates fell from 82% to 56%. Osteopathic graduates doubled, whereas international graduates increased to 53.8%. Successful matches were associated with US allopathic medical school graduates, university-affiliated general surgery residencies, eight or more interviews, United States Medical Licensing Examination scores greater than 230, and high post graduate year (PGY)1-3 American Board of Surgery In-service Training Examination scores (PGY1-64.7%, PGY2-61.2%, PGY3-60.7%; Conclusions: Although support for the independent plastic surgery track remains, program participation diminishes as applicant interest increases, intensifying match challenges. Increasing number of interviews improves match potential. Program leaders display varied commitments, with looming plans for some programs to discontinue offering this track. Applicant evaluation pivots on strong recommendations, research, and test scores.

Identifiers

PMID39114802
PMCPMC11302939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.