Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114735›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024

Effect of corneal diameter on preoperative screening results for corneal refractive surgery.

Lina Zhang, Qinglin Liu, Hui Shao, Lisha Ni, Kai Wang, Liwei Ma, Wu Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lina ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lishui People's Hospital Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.
Qinglin LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lishui People's Hospital Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.
Hui ShaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lishui People's Hospital Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.
Lisha NiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lishui People's Hospital Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lishui People's Hospital Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.
Liwei MaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lishui People's Hospital Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.
Wu HuangDepartment of ENT, Lishui People's Hospital Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the impact of different corneal diameters on corneal morphology and biomechanical outcome during preoperative screening for corneal refractive surgery.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 300 patients who underwent corneal refractive surgery at Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University between October 2023 and December 2023. All patients had no history of keratoconus or previous corneal surgery. Patients were categorized into two groups based on corneal topography measurements: (1) normal corneal diameter group (n=159), those with corneal diameter ranging from 11.5 mm to 12.0 mm; (2) abnormal corneal diameter group (n=141), those with corneal diameter smaller than 10.0 mm or larger than 12.5 mm. Corneal thickness, morphologic data, and biomechanical data were measured using Pentacam corneal topography. Correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between corneal diameter and various corneal topography and biomechanical data.

resultsSignificant differences were observed in corneal topography data including BFSf (F=43.21), BFSb (F=30.24), Df (F=15.32), Dp (F=32.36), Da (F=9.66), D (F=58.36), PPIavg (F=32.64), and ARTmax (F=12.06) between the groups (P<0.05). Additionally, BFSf, BFSb, Db, Dp, D, and PPIavg exhibited statistically significant differences between any two groups (P<0.05). Significant differences were also found in Df, Da, and ARTmax between small and large corneas, as well as between normal-sized and large corneas (P<0.05). Correlation analysis indicated negative correlations between corneal diameter and A1V (r=-0.12), HCdArcLength (r=-0.17), CBI (r=-0.27), bIOP (r=-0.13), Df (r=-0.025), PPIavg (r=-0.028), and TBI (r=-0.27). Conversely, BFSf (r=0.009), BFSb (r=0.001), PD (r=0.15), and ARTH (r=0.37) displayed positive correlations with corneal diameter.

conclusionsCorneal diameter significantly affects preoperative screening for corneal refractive surgery. Smaller corneal diameters exhibit a greater influence on the corneal topography BAD analysis system.

Indexed as

Corneal diametercorneal refractive surgerypreoperative screening results

Identifiers

PMID39114735
PMCPMC11301516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.