ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Predictive value of gradient boosting decision trees for postoperative atelectasis complications in patients with pulmonary destruction.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of prediction model for intrapulmonary metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma based on machine learning.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application value of a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) in predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients with destroyed lungs.
methodsA total of 170 patients with damaged lungs who underwent surgical treatment in Chest Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2021 to May 2023 were retrospectively selected. The patients were divided into a training set (n = 119) and a validation set (n = 51). Both GBDT algorithm model and Logistic regression model for predicting postoperative atelectasis in patients were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve were used to evaluate the prediction efficiency of the model.
resultsThe GBDT model indicated that the relative importance scores of the four influencing factors were operation time (51.037), intraoperative blood loss (38.657), presence of lung function (9.126) and sputum obstruction (1.180). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that operation duration and sputum obstruction were significant predictors of postoperative atelectasis among patients with destroyed lungs within the training set (
conclusionsGBDT model is suitable for predicting the incidence of complications in small samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.