ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Clinical value of low-dose three-dimensional reconstruction by multi-slice spiral computed tomography and by traditional X-ray in the diagnosis of distal radius epiphyseal injury in children.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the clinical value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) low-dose three-dimensional reconstruction and traditional X-ray in the auxiliary diagnosis of distal radius epiphyseal injury in children.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 105 children with distal radius bone scale injury (classified by Salter-Harris classification) admitted from March 2020 to June 2022. All children underwent MSCT three-dimensional reconstruction examination and traditional X-ray examination. The detection rate of epiphyseal injury of the distal radius was compared, along with the resolution, sensitivity and specificity. The image clarity and display degree of bone structure were analyzed. The radiation dose-related indicators and the time required for diagnosis were compared.
resultsThe detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of MSCT (100%, 92.38%) was significantly higher than that of X-ray (76.19%, 64.76%). In terms of radiation dose index, the volume dose index CTDI of MSCT ranged from 1-5 mGy while the X-ray group ranged from 5-10 mGy. The dose length product (DLP) value of the MSCT group was lower than in the X-ray group (20-100 mGy·cm vs. 50-150 mGy·cm). The diagnostic scan time for MSCT was shorter than that of conventional X-ray. The acceptance rate with MSCT was 99%, significantly higher than that with conventional X-ray (85%).
conclusionsLow-dose three-dimensional reconstruction of MSCT in the diagnosis of epiphyseal injury of distal radius in children shows significant advantages over traditional CT in the detection rate, diagnostic accuracy, postoperative reduction quality evaluation, and radiation dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.