ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Emergency patients' satisfaction with humanistic caring and its associated factors in Chinese hospitals: a multi-center cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Humanistic Interprofessional Healthcare Model for a Regional Swiss Hospital Using Community-Based Participatory Action Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Key factors influencing patient satisfaction in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patient satisfaction and its predictors in emergency department services at debre tabor comprehensive specialized hospital in Ethiopia: an ordinal logistic regression analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Investigation of the satisfaction levels of patients visiting the emergency department.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Humanistic caring in clinical practice is important for quality care and patient satisfaction. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction with humanistic care for emergency patients in China and its associated factors. Methods: From October 2023 to December 2023, a multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted across 28 provinces and 87 hospitals in China, using a sampling method for inpatients in emergency department. Patient satisfaction with humanistic care was evaluated by a self-developed questionnaire with 32 items across 6 dimensions. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to explore associated factors. Results: A total of 3,003 valid questionnaires were successfully collected, with an effective rate of 86.05%. The emergency patients' total mean humanistic caring satisfaction score was 4.67 ± 0.66. Age, medical insurance type, specialized emergency department visited, waiting times, whether had accompanied person, hospital level, and hospital type are correlated factors ( Conclusion: Hospitals at all levels should improve patients' perceived value, shorten waiting times, and provide caregivers with improved humanistic care in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.