Enhancing recovery and reducing readmissions: The impact of remote monitoring on acute postoperative care in outpatient total joint arthroplasty.

Introduction: Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is gaining popularity in the United States. With a shift towards value-based healthcare and bundled payment models, the importance of safe discharge after TJA is pertinent in reducing readmissions and subsequent cost of care. However, many acute issues or complications may not occur until after discharge which can result in emergency department visits and readmission. Our study aims to characterize the effect of remote monitoring devices on acute postoperative recovery in TJA discharged within 24 h. We hypothesized there would be a decreased readmission rate in the remote home monitoring cohort. Methods: This prospective cohort compared 50 outpatient TJAs (primary total hip and total knee replacements) defined as discharged within 24 h with a remote home monitoring device to 50 outpatient TJAs who did not receive remote monitoring. Demographics, hospital length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiology scores, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were compared with no significant difference observed between cohorts (p > 0.05). Patients' vital signs were transmitted to a virtual response center for up to 48 h after discharge. An on-call medical team reviewed the transmissions and if prompted, would contact the patient to troubleshoot and triage. Primary outcome was 30-day hospital readmissions rates, while 30-day ED visits and patient satisfaction scores for the remote home monitoring were measured as secondary outcomes. Results: Within the remote monitoring cohort there was a 20 % incidence (10 patients) of abnormal vitals captured and 2 patients visited the ED, however there were no readmissions attributed to this group. Readmission rates and ED visits in the control non-monitored group were significantly higher at 12 % (p = 0.03), secondary to syncope, uncontrolled postoperative pain, cellulitis, hip dislocations, and postoperative fever. Of the patients who received remote monitoring, 14 % had trouble connecting the device to their smartphone, 44 % felt home monitoring helped in their care while recovering at home, 52 % made them feel safer, and 70 % would recommend this program. Conclusions: Remote home monitoring with a virtual response team after outpatient TJA is a feasible way to mitigate readmissions in the acute postoperative period and increase patient satisfaction. Efforts to minimize costs should not be implemented at the expense of patients' health outcomes with a goal to find an appropriate balance between both agendas. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.