Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114421›Full record

ReviewAnnals of joint2024

Total knee arthroplasty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a narrative review.

Mattia Alessio-Mazzola, Nicolo' Biavardi, Giuseppe Solarino, Giuseppe Marongiu, Vincenzo Salini, Giacomo Placella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of joint, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mattia Alessio-MazzolaIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Unità Clinica di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-3713
Nicolo' BiavardiUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe SolarinoDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Università degli studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-9691
Giuseppe MarongiuDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Dullio Casula, AOU Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-454X
Vincenzo SaliniUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-3062
Giacomo PlacellaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-0404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Knee replacement following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be demanding due to altered anatomy, soft tissue scars, bone loss, extensor mechanism complications, and knee instability. This narrative review summarizes the strategies and approaches to managing operative challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following ACL reconstruction. Methods: Studies reporting outcomes of patients who underwent TKA after ACL reconstruction were retrieved and assessed to be included in this review that synthesizes the available evidence highlighting the pitfalls encountered during surgery, the intraoperative challenges posed by ligament balancing and exposure, and the leading role of modular and retained implants. Key Content and Findings: TKA following ACL reconstruction has a high rate of intra-operative complications such as instability, bone loss, difficult exposure and demanding soft tissue balancing, representing a revision surgery rather than routine primary knee arthroplasty and a revision-oriented skill set and modular components are recommended to significantly optimize both surgical strategy and patient outcomes. With a rising incidence of ACL injuries and growing reconstructions, anticipating an increase in TKA procedures, this review aims to provide a call for rethinking clinical approaches to ensure effective and patient-centric care. Conclusions: This narrative review seems to indicate that TKA after ACL reconstruction should be considered as revision surgery and modular components should be used. However, future prospective and high-quality studies are required to better clarify risk factors and give strong recommendations for this complex surgery.

Indexed as

augmentbone lossKnee replacementligament reconstructionmodularity

Identifiers

PMID39114421
PMCPMC11304087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.