Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114409›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024

The effect of stand-your-ground laws on student achievement.

Krista Ruffini, Carole Roan Gresenz, Nora Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Krista RuffiniGeorgetown University, McCourt School of Public Policy, Washington, DC, USA.
Carole Roan GresenzGeorgetown University, McCourt School of Public Policy, Washington, DC, USA.
Nora GordonGeorgetown University, McCourt School of Public Policy, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To examine how "stand-your-ground" (SYG) laws affect children's academic performance. Methods: We analyze 2008-2018 nationwide school district-level math and reading/language arts (RLA) test scores for 3rd-8th grade students combined with information on SYG laws by state and year. We implement two estimation approaches-two-way-fixed effects and group-time average treatment effects-and conduct analyses stratified by student race (Black, White) and area income level. Results: We find negative effects of SYG on math achievement among all students using both estimation approaches (-0.0377 standard deviation decline, p < 0.001 and -0.0493, p < 0.001). We find adverse effects of SYG on math among White students (-0.0315, p = 0.001 and -0.0312, p = 0.08) and among students in low-income districts (-0.0616, p < 0.001 and -0.0903, p < 0.001). The precision of estimates for the effect on math scores among Black students varies across approaches (-0.0666, p = 0.05, -0.0444, p = 0.48). We estimate negative effects of SYG on RLA achievement in only a subset of models. Conclusions: Our findings suggest SYG laws adversely affect math performance among 3rd-8th grade students. Policy implications: These findings underscore the importance of additional work to understand and quantify the relationship between the nation's gun policies and children's academic performance.

Indexed as

Child well-beingGun policyMath performanceStand-your-ground lawsStudent achievement

Identifiers

PMID39114409
PMCPMC11304866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.