ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Roles of distinct nuclear receptors in diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ZEB2 SUMOylation in Cardiac Fibroblast Drives Post-Infarction Cardiac Remodeling through CtBP1-Associated repression of Nr4a1.iScience · 2026Article
- PFAS Exposure and Metabolic Disorders: Mechanistic Insights into Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Resin Glycosides withBiomolecules · 2025Article
- Nuclear receptors in metabolic, inflammatory, and oncologic diseases: mechanisms, therapeutic advances, and future directions.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Roles of retinoic acid-related orphan receptor α in high glucose-induced cardiac fibroblasts proliferation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Association of Noise Exposure, Genetic Susceptibility, and Lifestyle With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus induces a pathophysiological disorder known as diabetic cardiomyopathy and may eventually cause heart failure. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is manifested with systolic and diastolic contractile dysfunction along with alterations in unique cardiomyocyte proteins and diminished cardiomyocyte contraction. Multiple mechanisms contribute to the pathology of diabetic cardiomyopathy, mainly including abnormal insulin metabolism, hyperglycemia, glycotoxicity, cardiac lipotoxicity, endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, calcium treatment damage, programmed myocardial cell death, improper Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System activation, maladaptive immune modulation, coronary artery endothelial dysfunction, exocrine dysfunction, etc. There is an urgent need to investigate the exact pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy and improve the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. The nuclear receptor superfamily comprises a group of transcription factors, such as liver X receptor, retinoid X receptor, retinoic acid-related orphan receptor-α, retinoid receptor, vitamin D receptor, mineralocorticoid receptor, estrogen-related receptor, peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor, nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A 1(NR4A1), etc. Various studies have reported that nuclear receptors play a crucial role in cardiovascular diseases. A recently conducted work highlighted the function of the nuclear receptor superfamily in the realm of metabolic diseases and their associated complications. This review summarized the available information on several important nuclear receptors in the pathophysiology of diabetic cardiomyopathy and discussed future perspectives on the application of nuclear receptors as targets for diabetic cardiomyopathy treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.