Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114336›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2024

Strategy actions to include students in a private hospital's nursing teams: A qualitative study.

Adele Neethling, Madeleen Rheeder-Jooste, Won-Li Richardson, Lizeth Roets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adele NeethlingFaculty of Education, Life Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5394-509X
Madeleen Rheeder-JoosteFaculty of Education, Life Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-383X
Won-Li RichardsonFaculty of Education, Life Healthcare, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7391-1281
Lizeth RoetsDepartment of Health Studies, Faculty of Nursing, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9537-212X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Student nurse education focusses on preparing competent professionals integral to nursing teams. Aim: To develop strategic actions to include student nurses within the nursing team. Setting: A private healthcare group in South Africa. Methods: A qualitative approach in three phases was used. Thirty purposively sampled participants recorded reflective journals in phase one. Tesch's eight steps were utilised for analysis. Phase two involved non-probability volunteer sampling of 11 participants for the nominal group technique analysis. In phase three, total population sampling recruited nine panellists for an e-Delphi technique that provided data that were open coded. Results: Phase one identified themes, including perceptions of responsibilities, support needs, recognition, conflict and communication issues. Phase two revealed five strategic actions: fair treatment, aligned work allocation, active participation, respect and acknowledgement of contributions. Phase three validated 19 strategic statements underpinning the strategic actions. Conclusion: Unit managers play a key role in fostering inclusivity, impacting student nurse retention. Contribution: Enhancing team cohesion can improve workplace wellness and patient outcomes while aiding in retention and recruitment efforts.

Indexed as

clinical placementexperiential learningnursing teamstrategic actionsstudent challengesstudent inclusionteam approach

Identifiers

PMID39114336
PMCPMC11304213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.