ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
CT morphological features and histogram parameters to predict micropapillary or solid components in stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GAN-generated target reconstruction CT radiomics for prediction of the novel IASLC grading of pulmonary adenocarcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Combining computed tomography features and histogram analysis facilitates differentiation between solitary pulmonary invasive mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinomas.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to construct prediction models based on computerized tomography (CT) signs, histogram and morphology features for the diagnosis of micropapillary or solid (MIP/SOL) components of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAC) and to evaluate the models' performance. Methods: This clinical retrospective study included image data of 376 patients with stage IA LUAC based on postoperative pathology, admitted to Putian First Hospital from January 2019 to June 2023. According to the presence of MIP/SOL components in postoperative pathology, patients were divided into MIP/SOL+ and MIP/SOL- groups. Cases with tumors ≤ 3 cm and ≤ 2 cm were separately analyzed. Each subgroup of patients was then randomly divided into a training set and a test set in a ratio of 7:3. The training set was used to build the prediction model, and the test set was used for internal validation. Results: For tumors ≤ 3 cm, ground-glass opacity (GGO) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.244; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.103-0.569; Conclusion: For tumors ≤ 3 cm and ≤ 2 cm, GGO, average CT value, and entropy were the same independent influencing factors in predicting MIP/SOL components of stage IA LUAC. The nomogram prediction models have potential diagnostic value for identifying MIP/SOL components of early-stage LUAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.