Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114269›Full record

ReviewAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research

Ocular image-based deep learning for predicting refractive error: A systematic review.

Samantha Min Er Yew, Yibing Chen, Jocelyn Hui Lin Goh, David Ziyou Chen, Marcus Chun Jin Tan, Ching-Yu Cheng, Victor Teck Chang Koh, Yih-Chung Tham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha Min Er YewDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yibing ChenSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Jocelyn Hui Lin GohSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
David Ziyou ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Chun Jin TanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Ching-Yu ChengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Victor Teck Chang KohDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yih-Chung ThamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uncorrected refractive error is a major cause of vision impairment worldwide and its increasing prevalent necessitates effective screening and management strategies. Meanwhile, deep learning, a subset of Artificial Intelligence, has significantly advanced ophthalmological diagnostics by automating tasks that required extensive clinical expertise. Although recent studies have investigated the use of deep learning models for refractive power detection through various imaging techniques, a comprehensive systematic review on this topic is has yet be done. This review aims to summarise and evaluate the performance of ocular image-based deep learning models in predicting refractive errors. Main text: We search on three databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) up till June 2023, focusing on deep learning applications in detecting refractive error from ocular images. We included studies that had reported refractive error outcomes, regardless of publication years. We systematically extracted and evaluated the continuous outcomes (sphere, SE, cylinder) and categorical outcomes (myopia), ground truth measurements, ocular imaging modalities, deep learning models, and performance metrics, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Nine studies were identified and categorised into three groups: retinal photo-based (n ​= ​5), OCT-based (n ​= ​1), and external ocular photo-based (n ​= ​3).For high myopia prediction, retinal photo-based models achieved AUC between 0.91 and 0.98, sensitivity levels between 85.10% and 97.80%, and specificity levels between 76.40% and 94.50%. For continuous prediction, retinal photo-based models reported MAE ranging from 0.31D to 2.19D, and Conclusions: The integration of deep learning model and ocular imaging for refractive error detection appear promising. However, their real-world clinical utility in current screening workflow have yet been evaluated and would require thoughtful consideration in design and implementation.

Identifiers

PMID39114269
PMCPMC11305245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.