ArticleCureus2024
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Once a Week for One Year in a Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to alleviate dyspnea, increase exercise capacity, and improve quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, such PR programs have focused on short-term effects. Thus, this study aimed to report our experience with a COPD patient who underwent PR once a week for one year. An 84-year-old male with stage II COPD, which was classified by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease, presented symptoms of dyspnea while walking. The patient underwent PR once a week for one year, which included exercise training, self-management support, instructions on breathing during exertion, and respiratory muscle stretching. Before and after PR, we assessed the patient's physical function, dyspnea, and quality of life. For one year, no adverse events were recorded. We observed that the patient's physical function, dyspnea, and quality of life improved over time. In particular, his six-minute walking distance (6MWD) reached the minimal clinically important difference at three months and the predictive value of 6MWD for healthy adults at six months. The present case showed that a PR program conducted once a week for one year might be feasible and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.