Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114212›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Emphasizing Patient-Centricity Through a Tailored Training Program to Empower Patients, Advocates, and Ethics Committees in Good Clinical Practice.

Poonam Bagai, Pooja Sharma, Aala Ansari, Nirbhay Singh, Sonal Sharma, Padam Singh, Durga Chougule, Manish Kumar Singh, Gargi Singh, Sanjeev Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Poonam BagaiPediatric Oncology, CanKids KidsCan, New Delhi, IND.
Pooja SharmaObstetrics and Gynecology, APAR Health, Gurugram, IND.
Aala AnsariPediatric Cancer Research, CanKids KidsCan, New Delhi, IND.
Nirbhay SinghPatient Navigation, Advocacy, and Family Engagement, CanKids KidsCan, New Delhi, IND.
Sonal SharmaPatient Navigation, Advocacy, and Family Engagement, CanKids KidsCan, New Delhi, IND.
Padam SinghClinical Research, Medanta Institute of Education and Research, Gurgaon, IND.
Durga ChouguleClinical Research, Medanta Institute of Education and Research, Gurgaon, IND.
Manish Kumar SinghClinical Research, Medanta Institute of Education and Research, Gurgaon, IND.
Gargi SinghClinical Research, Medanta Institute of Education and Research, Gurgaon, IND.
Sanjeev SinghAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Hospital, Faridabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGood Clinical Practices (GCP) are essential for patient-centric research. The standard bioethics and GCP training emphasizing a "one-size-fits-all" approach may not adequately equip ethics committee members, especially the lay and social scientist members, towards their critical role in reviewing clinical trials and related documentation. This article explores a patient-centered, patient advocates-driven training program focused on raising awareness about research ethics and GCP among patients, advocates and ethics committee members.

methodsA patient advocates-driven program called Patient Advocates for Clinical Research (PACER) conducted trainings focused on GCP for patient-centric research for patients, advocates and ethics committee members. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires were used to assess the participants' knowledge of GCP.

resultsThe workshop was attended by 116 participants. Of these 91 consented to participate in questionnaire evaluation that assessed participants' knowledge on ethics committee (EC) functionality, research ethics and data confidentiality. Pre-workshop evaluations highlighted knowledge gaps. Only 16.5% were familiar with the primary ethical consideration for vulnerable populations and 69.2% were knowledgeable about data governance. Post-workshop evaluations demonstrated significant overall response improvement of 5.4% (𝜒

conclusionThe workshop under PACER initiative highlighted the knowledge gaps in understanding the EC functionality, research ethics and data confidentiality. The workshop effectively fostered participants' understanding of ethical research practices.

Indexed as

clinical researchethics committeepatient advocatespatient-centric researchpatient navigators

Identifiers

PMID39114212
PMCPMC11303738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.