ArticleCureus2024
Ultra-Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy With Online Adaptive Technique: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CBCT-Based Online Adaptive, Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: First Clinical Experiences.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Evaluating intra-fraction motion and its dosimetric impact in ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- An End-to-end Quality Assurance Procedure for Ethos Online Adaptive Radiotherapy.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF RT) is revolutionizing the treatment approach for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. This study reports the planning process of UHF RT utilizing the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) treatment with the Ethos system, focusing on a comparative analysis between OART and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plans. We also assessed the pre-planning capabilities of the Ethos system against the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) system. A 66-year-old patient, diagnosed with prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma confirmed via biopsy and presenting with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, underwent UHF OART treatment using the Ethos system. The planning encompassed delineating the gross target volume (GTV) as the prostate, while the clinical target volume (CTV) comprised the prostate and proximal seminal vesicle. The planning target volume (PTV) was derived from the CTV with a 5 mm external margin except for a 3 mm posterior margin. A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique was employed, delivering 40 Gy in five fractions (8 Gy per fraction) to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and 36.25 Gy in five fractions (7.25 Gy per fraction) to the remaining part of the planning target volume (PTV), with treatments scheduled biweekly. We compared OART and IGRT plans and conducted a comparative analysis between Ethos planning and the CK system for pre-planning assessment. When comparing Ethos planning and CK plans, Ethos demonstrated slightly better target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. However, CK plans showed superior containment of low-dose spillage, particularly at 50% and 25% iso-doses, due to non-coplanar beam arrangements. Our results demonstrated that OART plans yielded superior target coverage and improved OAR sparing compared to IGRT plans. Notably, the entire OART process, from planning to delivery, was accomplished within 27 minutes. The Ethos OART system's ability to adapt to daily anatomical changes, efficient workflow, and superior OAR-sparing capabilities make it a promising option for prostate cancer treatment using UHF RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.