Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114140›Full record

ArticleNanoscale advances2024

Simulated HRTEM images of nanoparticles to train a neural network to classify nanoparticles for crystallinity.

Nina Gumbiowski, Juri Barthel, Kateryna Loza, Marc Heggen, Matthias Epple

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nina GumbiowskiInorganic Chemistry, Centre for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen 45117 Essen Germany matthias.epple@uni-due.de.
Juri BarthelErnst-Ruska Centre for Microscopy and Spectroscopy with Electrons, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 52428 Jülich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-4346
Kateryna LozaInorganic Chemistry, Centre for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen 45117 Essen Germany matthias.epple@uni-due.de.
Marc HeggenErnst-Ruska Centre for Microscopy and Spectroscopy with Electrons, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 52428 Jülich Germany.
Matthias EppleInorganic Chemistry, Centre for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen 45117 Essen Germany matthias.epple@uni-due.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1641-7068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning approaches for image analysis require extensive training datasets for an accurate analysis. This also applies to the automated analysis of electron microscopy data where training data are usually created by manual annotation. Besides nanoparticle shape and size distribution, their internal crystal structure is a major parameter to assess their nature and their physical properties. The automatic classification of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles (1-3 nm) by their crystallinity is possible after training a neural network with simulated HRTEM data. This avoids a human bias and the necessity to manually classify extensive particle sets as training data. The small size of these particles represents a significant challenge with respect to the question of internal crystallinity. The network was able to assign real particles imaged by HRTEM with high accuracy to the classes monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and amorphous after being trained with simulated datasets. The ability to adjust the simulation parameters opens the possibility to extend this procedure to other experimental setups and other types of nanoparticles.

Identifiers

PMID39114140
PMCPMC11302048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.