ArticleNanoscale advances2024
Simulated HRTEM images of nanoparticles to train a neural network to classify nanoparticles for crystallinity.
Article in Nanoscale advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combating multidrug-resistant pathogens, breast cancer (MCF-7) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) using biofabricated zinc oxide nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Characterizing DNA Origami Nanostructures in TEM Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning approaches for image analysis require extensive training datasets for an accurate analysis. This also applies to the automated analysis of electron microscopy data where training data are usually created by manual annotation. Besides nanoparticle shape and size distribution, their internal crystal structure is a major parameter to assess their nature and their physical properties. The automatic classification of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles (1-3 nm) by their crystallinity is possible after training a neural network with simulated HRTEM data. This avoids a human bias and the necessity to manually classify extensive particle sets as training data. The small size of these particles represents a significant challenge with respect to the question of internal crystallinity. The network was able to assign real particles imaged by HRTEM with high accuracy to the classes monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and amorphous after being trained with simulated datasets. The ability to adjust the simulation parameters opens the possibility to extend this procedure to other experimental setups and other types of nanoparticles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.