Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114132›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Perceptions and attitudes of health science students relating to artificial intelligence (AI): A scoping review.

Shokoufeh Derakhshanian, Lucy Wood, Elio Arruzza

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shokoufeh DerakhshanianUniSA Allied Health & Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia.
Lucy WoodUniSA Allied Health & Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-3904
Elio ArruzzaUniSA Allied Health & Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7328-6677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The recent integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across education, research, and clinical healthcare has led to a growing interest in AI training for healthcare students. This scoping review seeks to delve into existing literature, aiming to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes, of health science students toward the implementation of AI in their field. Methods: This review followed the methodological guidance offered by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic search was conducted in the databases Medline, Emcare, and Scopus. Studies using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were eligible if they explored the perceptions or attitudes of health science students in relation to AI. Relevant data from eligible articles was extracted and analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results: Ten studies were included. Articles reported on the primary outcomes of perceptions (i.e., thoughts, ideas, satisfaction, etc.) and attitudes (i.e., beliefs, tendencies, etc.). Disciplines included nursing, diagnostic radiography, pharmacy, midwifery, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech pathology were featured. Overall, students felt positively about the potential benefits AI would have on their future work. Students' interest and willingness to learn about AI was also favorable. Studies evaluating attitudes found positive correlations between attitudes toward AI, AI utilization, and intention to use AI. Negative perceptions related to threats of job security, and a lack of realism associated with AI software. Conclusion: Overall, evidence from this review indicates that health science students' worldwide hold positive perceptions toward AI. Educators should focus on instilling positive attitudes toward AI, given correlations between AI exposure and intention to adopt AI.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligenceeducationhealthhealthcare

Identifiers

PMID39114132
PMCPMC11303658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.