ArticleHealth science reports2024
Perceptions and attitudes of health science students relating to artificial intelligence (AI): A scoping review.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Occupational Exoskeletons as a Technological Solution for Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators for Sustainable Workplace Integration.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Occupational therapists' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Potential, preparedness, and training needs.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- Attitudes, Needs, and Expectations Regarding the Application of AI in Occupational Healthcare: A Multiple Stakeholder Perspective.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring health care learners' perceptions of AI integration in the curriculum: a survey tool and findings.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Nursing Students' Experiences With Artificial Intelligence: A Qualitative Study on Education, Clinical Practice, and Future Expectations.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Factors associated with job finding anxiety among senior health sciences students: the role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Dental students' knowledge, perceptions, and educational needs regarding artificial intelligence: a multinational cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Health sciences students' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: predictors of ethical awareness, clinical decision-making, and public health perceptions-a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- The Mediating Role of AI Ethics Awareness Between AI Attitudes and AI Utilization: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study of Saudi Nursing Students.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Evaluation of health professionals' perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in radiology: a questionnaire-based study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring Undergraduate Medical Students' Perspectives towards Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study from India.JMA journal · 2025Article
- Enhancing AI literacy in undergraduate pre-medical education through student associations: an educational intervention.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Nursing Students' Perspectives on Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Clinical Practice and Training: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Student Pharmacists' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2024Article
- Perceptions and attitudes of health science students relating to artificial intelligence (AI): A scoping review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The recent integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across education, research, and clinical healthcare has led to a growing interest in AI training for healthcare students. This scoping review seeks to delve into existing literature, aiming to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes, of health science students toward the implementation of AI in their field. Methods: This review followed the methodological guidance offered by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic search was conducted in the databases Medline, Emcare, and Scopus. Studies using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were eligible if they explored the perceptions or attitudes of health science students in relation to AI. Relevant data from eligible articles was extracted and analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results: Ten studies were included. Articles reported on the primary outcomes of perceptions (i.e., thoughts, ideas, satisfaction, etc.) and attitudes (i.e., beliefs, tendencies, etc.). Disciplines included nursing, diagnostic radiography, pharmacy, midwifery, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech pathology were featured. Overall, students felt positively about the potential benefits AI would have on their future work. Students' interest and willingness to learn about AI was also favorable. Studies evaluating attitudes found positive correlations between attitudes toward AI, AI utilization, and intention to use AI. Negative perceptions related to threats of job security, and a lack of realism associated with AI software. Conclusion: Overall, evidence from this review indicates that health science students' worldwide hold positive perceptions toward AI. Educators should focus on instilling positive attitudes toward AI, given correlations between AI exposure and intention to adopt AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.