Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114110›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of occupational and environmental medicine

Military Injuries: Helocasting Accident.

Anand Katiyar, Eranki Sibi, Anil Kumar, Nimit Solanki, Ajay K Dabas, Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anand KatiyarSurgical Division, Command Hospital (Northern Command), Udhampur, India.
Eranki SibiDepartment of Radiology, Surgical Division, Command Hospital (Northern Command), Udhampur, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Anil KumarSurgical Division, Command Hospital (Northern Command), Udhampur, India.
Nimit SolankiSurgical Division, Command Hospital (Northern Command), Udhampur, India.
Ajay K DabasSurgical Division, Command Hospital (Northern Command), Udhampur, India.
Ramanathan Saranga BharathiSurgical Division, Command Hospital (Northern Command), Udhampur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accidental injuries sustained during helocasting remain unexamined. Methods: Conditions prevalent during a helocasting exercise performed at a still water body and the resulting casualties were analyzed. Results: Despatch from greater-than-ideal height (>7 m) and speed (>5 knots) causes a high-velocity impact of the body with water in a non-aerodynamic configuration, exposing maximal body area at penetration. The brunt is borne by the torso/back, specifically, the lungs, ribs, and posterior aspect of the spine. The injuries result from direct trauma, sudden deceleration, barotrauma, and hyperflexion. Computerized tomography (CT) is the imaging of choice in the assessment of these injuries. Prompt evacuation to an equipped center, whilst stabilizing the spine in the suspected, proves pivotal to the outcome. Conclusions: Adverse slamming dynamics cause accidental injuries in helocasting. Thorax and spine are predominantly traumatized, both directly and indirectly, and are assessed best using CT. Timely spine stabilization and evacuation prove vital. Accurate assessment of height/speed and adherence to their ideal limits, at despatch, may avert such injuries.

Indexed as

Barotraumahelocastinghigh-velocity impact with waterlung injurymilitary injuriesspine injury

Identifiers

PMID39114110
PMCPMC11302542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.