ArticleHeliyon2024
An extensive investigation of convolutional neural network designs for the diagnosis of lumpy skin disease in dairy cows.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust multi-class lumpy skin disease diagnosis for practical livestock applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Deep Learning System for Detection and Classification of Lumpy Skin Disease in Cattle: Enhancing Precision and Efficiency in Veterinary Diagnostics.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Mpox-XDE: an ensemble model utilizing deep CNN and explainable AI for monkeypox detection and classification.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Optimized Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm enabled DETR (DEtection TRansformer) model for skin disease classification.PloS one · 2025Article
- Segmentation for mammography classification utilizing deep convolutional neural network.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Ensemble of hybrid model based technique for early detecting of depression based on SVM and neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of lumpy skin disease virus using customized CBAM-DenseNet-attention model.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-03-17Error in Text · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/326CBCB3D126E2D34C3788CE284AB7
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cow diseases are a major source of concern for people. Some diseases in animals that are discovered in their early stages can be treated while they are still treatable. If lumpy skin disease (LSD) is not properly treated, it can result in significant financial losses for the farm animal industry. Animals like cows that sign this disease have their skin seriously affected. A reduction in milk production, reduced fertility, growth retardation, miscarriage, and occasionally death are all detrimental effects of this disease in cows. Over the past three months, LSD has affected thousands of cattle in nearly fifty districts across Bangladesh, causing cattle farmers to worry about their livelihood. Although the virus is very contagious, after receiving the right care for a few months, the affected cattle can be cured. The goal of this study was to use various deep learning and machine learning models to determine whether or not cows had lumpy disease. To accomplish this work, a Convolution neural network (CNN) based novel architecture is proposed for detecting the illness. The lumpy disease-affected area has been identified using image preprocessing and segmentation techniques. After the extraction of numerous features, our proposed model has been evaluated to classify LSD. Four CNN models, DenseNet, MobileNetV2, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2 were used to classify the framework, and evaluation metrics were computed to determine how well the classifiers worked. MobileNetV2 has been able to achieve 96% classification accuracy and an AUC score of 98% by comparing results with recently published relevant works, which seems both good and promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.