ArticleHeliyon2024
Intrathecal drug delivery systems for cancer pain: A retrospective analysis at a single tertiary medical center in China.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Pharmacologic- and Non-pharmacologic Interventions for Cancer Pain: A Narrative Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Decoding Pancreatic Cancer Pain: From Tumor-Nerve Crosstalk to Targeted Analgesic Strategies.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Breaking the pain barrier: implantable intrathecal pump therapy as a game-changer in cancer pain management.Radiology and oncology · 2025Review
- [Sub-committee of Anesthesiology of Guangzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Society].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of single and double catheter intrathecal drug delivery systems in patients with refractory neck and abdominal cancer pain.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) have been clinically applied to treat refractory cancer-related pain for years. In this study, we demonstrate the current clinical practice and outcomes of IDDS for cancer pain management over a 3-year period at a single tertiary medical center in China. Methods: Patients who received IDDS implantation for cancer-related pain from 2021 to 2023 were identified. The electronic medical records of all eligible patients were retrospectively reviewed for study data including baseline characteristics, IDDS variables and postoperative clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 96 consecutive individuals were identified for analysis and complete follow-up information was available in 72 patients with a follow-up rate of 75 %. Patients were 49.0 % female with a mean age of 62 ± 10 years. The top five cancer types in IDDS population were lung (34.4 %), colorectal (17.7 %), pancreatic (11.5 %), breast (5.2 %) and liver (4.2 %) cancer. The median duration from cancer diagnosis to IDDS implantation was 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-48 months) and from pain onset to IDDS implantation was 6 months (IQR 2-12 months). In addition, the median oral morphine equivalents (OME) daily dose was 290 mg (IQR 100-632 mg). Mean NRS was 7.5 ± 0.8 before implantation and decreased to an average of 3.0 ± 1.1 after IDDS ( Conclusion: IDDS therapy is a valuable option for patients suffering from cancer pain. More and more cancer pain patients receive IDDS to treat pain during the 3-year study period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.