ArticleHeliyon2024
Blood collection tube and anticoagulant influence on SARS-CoV-2 antibody and avidity levels.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 serology plays a crucial role in assessing COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Tube type and anticoagulant may influence serology results. Thus, understanding the influence of these variables in test results is key. We evaluated the influence of serum collection tube type and anticoagulant on anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Luminex multiplex assays (11-plex) in serum and plasma samples. Anti-spike IgG avidity was also evaluated in both sample types. No significant differences were found between serology assay results using different blood (serum) collection tube types. However, significantly lower antibody concentrations (p < 0.05) were observed in tubes with the anticoagulants sodium citrate and acid citrate dextrose (ACD) in the ELISA and Multiplex assays (n = 29), compared to expected concentrations. These differences mostly disappeared after adjusting for the dilution factor caused by the anticoagulant volume, indicating that anticoagulant does not significantly impact the assay results, while anticoagulant volume does. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in IgG avidity (M) of plasma samples (p < 0.05) compared to serum, but anticoagulant type had no effect. Overall, these findings indicate that the choice of collection tube may introduce subtle variations in assay results if the volumes of anticoagulants are not taken into consideration. Additionally, differences between serum and anticoagulant-treated plasma matrices were observed in avidity ELISAs, indicating that these samples are not interchangeable for these assays; a finding that requires further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.