Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39114017›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

The impact of teacher autonomy support on students' assessment literacy: The chain mediating effects of self-efficacy and critical reflection.

Jie Xu, Shang Zhang, Hao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie XuFaculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, 710062, People's Republic of China.
Shang ZhangFaculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, 710062, People's Republic of China.
Hao ChenFaculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, 710062, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the realm of classroom assessment, the shift towards "assessment as learning" underscores the pivotal role of students in developing assessment literacy. This study aims to bridge the gap in the literature by examining the understudied area of students' assessment literacy. The author introduces a novel chain mediation effect structure model to investigate the interactions between teacher autonomy support, self-efficacy, critical reflection, and students' assessment literacy. The sample comprises 704 high school students from central China, with an even gender distribution (321 boys and 383 girls), which provides a robust dataset for analysis. By utilizing the Student Evaluative Scale, Critical Reflection Scale, and Self-Efficacy Scale, the study reveals a significant and positive correlation between teacher autonomy support and the level of assessment literacy among students. Furthermore, the findings indicate that self-efficacy and critical reflection act as mediators in the relationship between teacher autonomy support and students' assessment literacy. This suggests that educators who foster an environment of autonomy, empowering students to take ownership of their learning, can significantly enhance students' belief in their own abilities (self-efficacy) and their capacity for reflective thinking, thereby improving students' assessment literacy. The study concludes with concrete suggestions for classroom practice and identifies avenues for future research to further refine our understanding of the complex interplay between teacher support, student self-efficacy, critical reflection, and assessment literacy.

Indexed as

Chinese high school studentsCritical reflectionSelf-efficacyStudents' assessment literacyTeacher autonomy support

Identifiers

PMID39114017
PMCPMC11305281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.